Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Re: “The findings highlight a regulatory gap, as the FDA allows up to 10,000 ppb of lead in fluoride-free toothpaste (classified as cosmetics) and 20,000 ppb in fluoride varieties (classified as drugs), far exceeding health advocates’ safety recommendations.”

What is the point of the FDA, or any ‘regulator’ for that matter, including the worse than useless TGA in Australia?!

We’d be much better off with ‘buyer beware’, than these wretched ‘regulators’ which can even approve products that can end up MANDATED for use, ie vaccines.

What a rotten set-up!

Expand full comment
Dan...'s avatar

It’s a weird logic with toothpaste. Eating is a daily, natural process throughout our lifetime. We are designed to eat. And we have tools designed specifically for that purpose: our teeth. We do not have any sprinklers, wipers or similar tools built into our mouth. Except for saliva release and drinking capability, our body has no other “cleaning” mechanisms.

Why is toothpaste made up of a dozen of chemicals? Why do we need them? If the eating process takes 20 minutes, you simply take a nice, soft brush and use it to clean your teeth with clean water. No need and no reason to press those chemicals into your gums.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts