'Conversation' is the last thing to expect from this biased website that simply censors discussion that challenges 'The Science TM'.
I know this from personal experience, as I was banned from commenting on articles on The Conversation in April 2016, after commenting on an article by Julie Leask, see this link for more background: The Conversation - a marketing arm for the university and research sector? https://over-vaccination.net/the-conversation-forum/
As for Catherine Bennett, when I tried to engage her in correspondence about the mandated Covid jabs, i.e. what is the scientific and medical justification for these mandated medical interventions? Bennett responded "STOP writing to me. REMOVE me from this email cc list. I will NOT ask again Hopefully that is clear enough for you" Email to me dated 19 October 2022.
So this is our dilemma Ian. People such as Catherine Bennett, knocking around in universities, are having extraordinary influence over taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, for example with Bennett being the health lead on the purportedly 'independent' Inquiry into the Australian Government COVID-19 Response - but these people refuse to be accountable to the public, and respond in a menacing way to shut people down.
Here we are, taxpayers, with our taxes being used to fund highly questionable products such as the COVID-19 vaccine products, but where are we to find accountability?
Safe and Effective. However the truth is very different.
None are safe, none are effective // All are harmful, Some genocidal
After 35 years of dissecting the details of innumeral studies with Doctorate level education,
realized it is a dog chasing its tail game.
The fork in the road is actually quite simple. Either one believes that health originates from needles or they realize this is patently ridiculous and worse.
Any health seeker who has done cursory study, realizes that Big P and most MD's
know precious little concerning health.
Health comes from healthful living. Nutrition is front row and center, an unwavering position.
That study is lifelong paying dividends as we age.
RFK is taking numbers in a pit of vipers. He has trust including the confidence of a worldwide audience. He is well loved stateside.
Patience is a virtue coupled with brilliant analysis here on Dr. Brighthope's sub.
I'm not technically as qualified as Ian or the Comments attached here.
My simplest question, I think, is blindingly obvious: to what extent can the human immune system handle what it is hit with?
And why wasn't it's incredible power harnessed in the COVID crisis?
The jabs and 'boosters' thrown around ought to have meant 'immune boosters' such as improved diet, increasing exercise and, hey presto, enhanced sleep patterns.
Are humans being setup to be treated like the poultry industry by the marfia drug pharma cartels via your grubberment?
Generations of chickens in the poultry industry are immune compromised due to injections and antibiotics to the degree that the chickens have no natural immunity to anything.
Is this what we want for our children and their progeny?
God bless RFK Jr, and God, please help him to continue his mission and ban the "vaccines" the gene modifiers that are the triggers of trans-humanism/posthumanism.
Why would one try to debate let alone lampoon or rebut The Con at this juncture? 2021 maybe, but surely not now? The time is past. We're now circling the drain while RFK Jnr. advances wearable surveillance technology.
But The Con is as the con does.
National iterations of its identity confirm the obvious ideology endemic in institutions, politics, medicine, science, (anti)social science and derivatives.
"Their training in social sciences and epidemiology, rather than hard sciences like immunology, limits their ability to engage with vaccine safety’s technical complexities."
The adoption of a logical fallacy (argumentum ad verecundiam) appears an error.
Disregarding the inherent flaws well identified in the scientific methodology surrounding the unseen obligate intracellular parasite that is now extant in an invalid in silico pantomime because presumably, thus it is spruiked by virus "experts," and such "experts" should not be challenged as no one actually has a clue what the arcane methodologically flawed, scientific nonsense they gabble actually means?
I think not.
This is the same reasoning that intentionally silos learning and education because it may not be part of a defined 'scope of practice'; neither is 'ethics' nor 'logic' it appears.
Indeed, such reasoning seems why we all find ourselves in the distressing quandary we now so reluctantly embrace.
Smart play Ian,what a legacy this bloke could have left to the world. It probably would have cost him his life, they like taking out Kennedy's but from what I've heard, not heard & read, he's in on it as well. $ntegrity, not.
I was a very early member of The Conversation that was the brainchild of two Melbourne University people.
It was an interaction between the Public and University employees, who would write an Article relating to their area of experteeism. The contributions and exchange of knowledge and practical experiences informed those employees, and the public, as it was an open frank honest discussion then.
I enjoyed that site, until some years later I detected controlling behaviours creeping onto the site.
Waited a few more months and not enjoying the site, I did research and what a surprise, Billy Gates had taken "shares" in The Conversation. Shades of The Cochrane Collaboration and its founder Dr Peter C. Gøtzsche takeover again. The Cochrane Collaboration had 30,000 volunteer Scientists in the World, (I note the Cochrane group is no longer in Denmark but now named a British group), The Conversation was given "a makeover" and a paid CEO EDITOR or whatever she is called was installed, and who knows what else.
RFK Jnr is using his legal mind in his new position, There are enormous pressures that would be placed on him, trackable electronics maybe a result of that.
Dr Brighthope this is an excellent article that elucidates and teaches important factrors that the public needs to include in their set of reading and comprehension skills.
I am always amused by the fact that it is the slaves taxdollars, given to these NGOs/NFPF (Not For Profit Foundations) etc by the slave's Grubberments to control the slaves ie. Tax Slaves hard earnt dollars are used to control the Tax Slaves.
Children's Health Defense gave a rundown of some of the new members of RFk Jr's new ACIP Committee...All had ties to Big Pharma. Many promoted vaxxes ...shown in their resumes. For 64 years I have been studying health...and it does not stem from drugs or vaccines. Drugs and vaxxes put substances into the bloodstream that stress the immune system. Fifty years ago, I studied information on the immune System and the lymph glands, which propagates white corpuscles, which keep the bloodstream clear of all toxic items, such as, foreign proteins, bacteria, viruses, allergenic food particles, etc. The bloodstream is designed to carry nutrients from natural unprocessed food to all the organs and cells. It was not designed to carry any other substances...which would damage the organs and cells; particularly, the toxic items that are in all vaccines. The VAXX Industry said "There was a greater response, when aluminum and mercury were added." They have to have been totally ignorant...Of course, there would be a greater response by our natural immune system, when toxic poison was added. How the medical profession could have gone along with the Vaxx Industries information... shows complete ignorance on how the immune system actually works.
Thank you Barbara, most appreciate your candid input.
Our immune system goes into overdrive to rid/flush the body of toxins. Yet, these allopathic jab industry quacks twist outcomes to Psyop the People for forever more jabs all for monetory purposes.
Another fabulous and thoughtful article Ian. It brings to mind the oft quipped "I tried to follow The Science , and the Science wasn't there. So, I decided to follow the money....and that's where I found the Science". Or more frighteningly, for anyone that continues to consume mainstream media "He who controls the media, controls the minds of men" - Noam Chomsky
'The Conversation' Ian...
What an ironically titled website...
'Conversation' is the last thing to expect from this biased website that simply censors discussion that challenges 'The Science TM'.
I know this from personal experience, as I was banned from commenting on articles on The Conversation in April 2016, after commenting on an article by Julie Leask, see this link for more background: The Conversation - a marketing arm for the university and research sector? https://over-vaccination.net/the-conversation-forum/
As for Catherine Bennett, when I tried to engage her in correspondence about the mandated Covid jabs, i.e. what is the scientific and medical justification for these mandated medical interventions? Bennett responded "STOP writing to me. REMOVE me from this email cc list. I will NOT ask again Hopefully that is clear enough for you" Email to me dated 19 October 2022.
So this is our dilemma Ian. People such as Catherine Bennett, knocking around in universities, are having extraordinary influence over taxpayer-funded vaccination policy, for example with Bennett being the health lead on the purportedly 'independent' Inquiry into the Australian Government COVID-19 Response - but these people refuse to be accountable to the public, and respond in a menacing way to shut people down.
Here we are, taxpayers, with our taxes being used to fund highly questionable products such as the COVID-19 vaccine products, but where are we to find accountability?
On the subject of 'The Conversation', also note "The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funded The Conversation Media Group in Australia to help launch pilots in the United States and in South Africa." https://theconversation.com/us/partners/the-bill-and-melinda-gates-foundation
Wow Elizabeth, still a champion!
I was also trained to promote the slogan.
Safe and Effective. However the truth is very different.
None are safe, none are effective // All are harmful, Some genocidal
After 35 years of dissecting the details of innumeral studies with Doctorate level education,
realized it is a dog chasing its tail game.
The fork in the road is actually quite simple. Either one believes that health originates from needles or they realize this is patently ridiculous and worse.
Any health seeker who has done cursory study, realizes that Big P and most MD's
know precious little concerning health.
Health comes from healthful living. Nutrition is front row and center, an unwavering position.
That study is lifelong paying dividends as we age.
RFK is taking numbers in a pit of vipers. He has trust including the confidence of a worldwide audience. He is well loved stateside.
Patience is a virtue coupled with brilliant analysis here on Dr. Brighthope's sub.
Thank you truth seeker. I concur.
Leask is a Mandatory Fluoridation fanatic.
Epidemiology ignores all Toxicology.
Thanks Geoff,
The 2 main causes of disease are malnutrition and toxins (superimposed on the genes one inherits.
The physician only need find the 2 and correct as soon as possible.
I'm not technically as qualified as Ian or the Comments attached here.
My simplest question, I think, is blindingly obvious: to what extent can the human immune system handle what it is hit with?
And why wasn't it's incredible power harnessed in the COVID crisis?
The jabs and 'boosters' thrown around ought to have meant 'immune boosters' such as improved diet, increasing exercise and, hey presto, enhanced sleep patterns.
Simple is best time. And often the most accurate.
Are humans being setup to be treated like the poultry industry by the marfia drug pharma cartels via your grubberment?
Generations of chickens in the poultry industry are immune compromised due to injections and antibiotics to the degree that the chickens have no natural immunity to anything.
Is this what we want for our children and their progeny?
Hit the nail on the head.
God bless RFK Jr, and God, please help him to continue his mission and ban the "vaccines" the gene modifiers that are the triggers of trans-humanism/posthumanism.
Why would one try to debate let alone lampoon or rebut The Con at this juncture? 2021 maybe, but surely not now? The time is past. We're now circling the drain while RFK Jnr. advances wearable surveillance technology.
But The Con is as the con does.
National iterations of its identity confirm the obvious ideology endemic in institutions, politics, medicine, science, (anti)social science and derivatives.
"Their training in social sciences and epidemiology, rather than hard sciences like immunology, limits their ability to engage with vaccine safety’s technical complexities."
The adoption of a logical fallacy (argumentum ad verecundiam) appears an error.
Disregarding the inherent flaws well identified in the scientific methodology surrounding the unseen obligate intracellular parasite that is now extant in an invalid in silico pantomime because presumably, thus it is spruiked by virus "experts," and such "experts" should not be challenged as no one actually has a clue what the arcane methodologically flawed, scientific nonsense they gabble actually means?
I think not.
This is the same reasoning that intentionally silos learning and education because it may not be part of a defined 'scope of practice'; neither is 'ethics' nor 'logic' it appears.
Indeed, such reasoning seems why we all find ourselves in the distressing quandary we now so reluctantly embrace.
At least with Leask & Bennett you know what you're getting but RFK Jnr is going to be a HUGE let down. Any bets?
No bets. I find telling the future as difficult as the most problematic aspect of medicine- prognostication.
Smart play Ian,what a legacy this bloke could have left to the world. It probably would have cost him his life, they like taking out Kennedy's but from what I've heard, not heard & read, he's in on it as well. $ntegrity, not.
I won’t bet against that Roc!
I was a very early member of The Conversation that was the brainchild of two Melbourne University people.
It was an interaction between the Public and University employees, who would write an Article relating to their area of experteeism. The contributions and exchange of knowledge and practical experiences informed those employees, and the public, as it was an open frank honest discussion then.
I enjoyed that site, until some years later I detected controlling behaviours creeping onto the site.
Waited a few more months and not enjoying the site, I did research and what a surprise, Billy Gates had taken "shares" in The Conversation. Shades of The Cochrane Collaboration and its founder Dr Peter C. Gøtzsche takeover again. The Cochrane Collaboration had 30,000 volunteer Scientists in the World, (I note the Cochrane group is no longer in Denmark but now named a British group), The Conversation was given "a makeover" and a paid CEO EDITOR or whatever she is called was installed, and who knows what else.
RFK Jnr is using his legal mind in his new position, There are enormous pressures that would be placed on him, trackable electronics maybe a result of that.
Dr Brighthope this is an excellent article that elucidates and teaches important factrors that the public needs to include in their set of reading and comprehension skills.
[The Conversation was given "a makeover"]
Strongly Agree. A very Dark, Monetory Makeover.
I am always amused by the fact that it is the slaves taxdollars, given to these NGOs/NFPF (Not For Profit Foundations) etc by the slave's Grubberments to control the slaves ie. Tax Slaves hard earnt dollars are used to control the Tax Slaves.
Citing the Samoa measles outbreak and linking it to Kennedy is contradicting their own claim that "correlation does not equal causation."
You know what other event is correlated to measles cases at that time? An aggressive measles vaccine campaign.
Children's Health Defense gave a rundown of some of the new members of RFk Jr's new ACIP Committee...All had ties to Big Pharma. Many promoted vaxxes ...shown in their resumes. For 64 years I have been studying health...and it does not stem from drugs or vaccines. Drugs and vaxxes put substances into the bloodstream that stress the immune system. Fifty years ago, I studied information on the immune System and the lymph glands, which propagates white corpuscles, which keep the bloodstream clear of all toxic items, such as, foreign proteins, bacteria, viruses, allergenic food particles, etc. The bloodstream is designed to carry nutrients from natural unprocessed food to all the organs and cells. It was not designed to carry any other substances...which would damage the organs and cells; particularly, the toxic items that are in all vaccines. The VAXX Industry said "There was a greater response, when aluminum and mercury were added." They have to have been totally ignorant...Of course, there would be a greater response by our natural immune system, when toxic poison was added. How the medical profession could have gone along with the Vaxx Industries information... shows complete ignorance on how the immune system actually works.
Thank you Barbara, most appreciate your candid input.
Our immune system goes into overdrive to rid/flush the body of toxins. Yet, these allopathic jab industry quacks twist outcomes to Psyop the People for forever more jabs all for monetory purposes.
Another fabulous and thoughtful article Ian. It brings to mind the oft quipped "I tried to follow The Science , and the Science wasn't there. So, I decided to follow the money....and that's where I found the Science". Or more frighteningly, for anyone that continues to consume mainstream media "He who controls the media, controls the minds of men" - Noam Chomsky