If the ‘Social Media Minimum Age Bill’ is passed, perhaps we should all thank Michelle Rowland on her Facebook page, that young people would no longer be exposed to the horrific reports of Covid vaccine adverse events. We could include in our posts peer-reviewed studies, on everything from myocarditis to retinal vein occlusions, to cerebral venous thromboses to deaths.
Thanks, all done, Ian. I also sent Senator Broadbent a copy of the disacussion paper "Ground Zero Darwin", in the hope he will warn Aussies their demise might only be weeks away, and that Malcolm Fraser got it right in his book "Dangerous Allies".
Upon reading the letter that the Aligned Council of Australia has put together I found this part disturbing....
"1. Lack of Transparency in Verification Methods
The bill does not provide any clarity on how age and identity verification will be implemented for users over 16. Without this information, there are significant unanswered questions about the security of personal data and the potential for misuse."
So, if you are over 16 then you will need to verify that you are over 16, and they have not clarified how this is done? Could they insist that the digital ID is used?
I agree with Prof. Brighthope. Rushing through a bill, when the senators are absent that would probably revoke the bill. is an insult to the democratic process. However, in that vein, it unveils their true intentions which are more aligned to a dictatorship!
If the ‘Social Media Minimum Age Bill’ is passed, perhaps we should all thank Michelle Rowland on her Facebook page, that young people would no longer be exposed to the horrific reports of Covid vaccine adverse events. We could include in our posts peer-reviewed studies, on everything from myocarditis to retinal vein occlusions, to cerebral venous thromboses to deaths.
And she has 20,000 followers who may be interested.
Thanks, all done, Ian. I also sent Senator Broadbent a copy of the disacussion paper "Ground Zero Darwin", in the hope he will warn Aussies their demise might only be weeks away, and that Malcolm Fraser got it right in his book "Dangerous Allies".
Upon reading the letter that the Aligned Council of Australia has put together I found this part disturbing....
"1. Lack of Transparency in Verification Methods
The bill does not provide any clarity on how age and identity verification will be implemented for users over 16. Without this information, there are significant unanswered questions about the security of personal data and the potential for misuse."
So, if you are over 16 then you will need to verify that you are over 16, and they have not clarified how this is done? Could they insist that the digital ID is used?
I agree with Prof. Brighthope. Rushing through a bill, when the senators are absent that would probably revoke the bill. is an insult to the democratic process. However, in that vein, it unveils their true intentions which are more aligned to a dictatorship!