by Steven Pelech and Christopher Shaw is a compelling and comprehensive examination of the COVID-19 pandemic, offering a fresh perspective on this global event.
The pity of it all is that high school students in Australia will never be allowed to view or read an alternative view to that of MSM, just as they will never be allowed to dead alternative views on abortion, assisted suicide, transgenderism…and in Australia, any person who opposes the cultural marxist, NWO plans.
In Australia it has been that bad for decades. It is very easy to promote one idea and simply ignore another without anyone realising. An example for today would be the banning if international speakers from even entering our country (think Candace Owens); who would realise? No-one, unless they had been alerted to such a banning. On abortion, do you recall the film, ‘Silent Scream’ that was being used in high schools to show what abortions actually accomplished? Well, that had a few minutes before it was crushed and it was buried.
The Vitamin C omission is a worry, since a large number of deaths could have been prevented with intravenous Vitamin C. A Chinese study showed a 66% reduction in hospitalisations with vitamin C injections. Since old people generally don't respond well to vaccines, Vitamin C injections would have been far more effective without any side affects or need or clinical trials.
If most or all people had 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L) or more circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (made in the liver over several days from ingested of UV-B -> skin produced vitamin D3) the lab-escaped SARS-CoV-2 virus would never have spread in pandemic fashion. Even with today's more infectious strains, in a naive population, this would probably suppress R0 well below the 1.0 required for pandemic transmission.
For instance, in the UK, in the summer of 2020, before there were any so-called vaccines, COVID-19 numbers were dwindling rapidly and the pandemic was thought to be over. See the second chart at: https:// vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#4.2 . The virus had infected the most vulnerable - I think mainly in London, among the elderly in care homes and especially among those with dark or black skin, whose 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are perilously low without proper vitamin D3 supplementation.* With those most vulnerable (those with the lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels) either dead or with strong natural immunity against this original strain, the number of hospitalised COVID-19 patients was halving every month or so. It got down to 795 patients in late August, from a peak of 19,617 in April. This was primarily due to the summer general rise in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, even though this takes the white population's mean levels only to about half of the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L needed for full immune system function. There was little or no masking or social distancing in this time.
In September and later, as 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels dropped and as a new, more infectious strain of SARS-CoV-2 emerged, infections rose and so did the number of hospitalised patients. So I argue that in Wuhan, if everyone had had at least 50 ng/mL 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the lab-escaped virus would have infected few, if any, people, and those who were infected would have had such mild infections, in general, that they would have shed far too few viruses for the disease to spread in a pandemic fashion.
*See the graphs at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#03-uk-low. The second is from Sutherland et al. 2020: https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.11.019 and the first I made from data in that article's Table 2. The first shows that in both summer and winter, for the "Asian" people (of Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi descent) in the 40 to 68 year olds sampled in this BIOBANK 2006 to 2010 research period, 91% had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) or less. Over half of these people had 10 ng/mL (25 nmol/L) or less. (This is from Table 2, in which the four summer columns and the four winter columns depict proportions of the group with 25(OH)D levels below 25 nmol/L, between 25 and 50 nmol/L etc. The percentage signs at the top of the table should be "nmol/L".
There is little summer / winter difference in levels for those with dark or black skin, but the differences for people with white skin are much more pronounced. From Table 2, in winter and spring, among the White European people in the research study, 17.5% had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 25 nmol/L (10 ng/mL) while in summer and autumn, this drops to 5.9%.
Since this significant summer / winter modulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels for most of the population, most dramatically in those with the lowest levels, was apparently largely responsible for the pandemic of the original Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 dying out rapidly in mid-2020, it is reasonable to extrapolate this to a situation where everyone had at least 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L all year round. In such a situation, where most people's immune system worked well, rather than not very well - and for some people very poorly - it is reasonable to think that no variant of SARS-CoV-2 would spread in pandemic fashion, even with the population with no immunity to these specific viruses, and with no social distancing, masking etc., or other interventions such as genuine vaccines or the gene-therapies falsely marketed as vaccines.
While large amounts of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) can be very effective in acute viral infections, I believe that by far the most important preventive technique is having as many people as possible attaining 50 ng/mL or more circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D all year round. The only practical, safe, way of doing this is proper vitamin D3 supplementation at levels, which while small, are 8 or more times what governments and many doctors recommend. New Jersey based Professor of Medicine Sunil Wimalawansa has recommended quantities, based on body weight and obesity status: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how-much.
With today's typically very low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in patients hospitalised for viral infections and sepsis, the most important treatment is surely using a single oral dose of calcifediol (such as 1.0 milligram for 70 kg body weight) to boost circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D safely over 50 ng/mL in a few hours. https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#4.7 Calcifediol is another name for 25-hydroxyvitamin D. It is easily absorbed and goes straight into circulation. A loading (bolus = large, single) dose of vitamin D3 is the next best approach, such as 10 mg (400,000 IU). However, this takes some days to raise circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D due to the need for hydroxylation in the liver.
This, combined with Prof. Wimalawansa's 0.014 mg / kg body weight calcifediol protocol would be even more effective than either treatment alone.
Intravenous ascorbic acid requires hospital facilities, medical staff and precisely measured, sterile, fluids. This limits its applicability in remote locations and developing countries.
I recall that Prof. Brighthope led research into a rectal route of supplying sodium ascorbate, which is as effective as IV ascorbic acid. This does not rely on sterile materials and hypodermic needles, so it is much more applicable in remote locations and developing countries. I can't find my links about this, but this form of treatment is mentioned at: https://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v10n13.shtml.
The pity of it all is that high school students in Australia will never be allowed to view or read an alternative view to that of MSM, just as they will never be allowed to dead alternative views on abortion, assisted suicide, transgenderism…and in Australia, any person who opposes the cultural marxist, NWO plans.
Wow, had no idea it was that bad. The people must rise up and just say no to this madness.
In Australia it has been that bad for decades. It is very easy to promote one idea and simply ignore another without anyone realising. An example for today would be the banning if international speakers from even entering our country (think Candace Owens); who would realise? No-one, unless they had been alerted to such a banning. On abortion, do you recall the film, ‘Silent Scream’ that was being used in high schools to show what abortions actually accomplished? Well, that had a few minutes before it was crushed and it was buried.
Can you find the film for me please?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Silent_Scream
What pandemic?
The Vitamin C omission is a worry, since a large number of deaths could have been prevented with intravenous Vitamin C. A Chinese study showed a 66% reduction in hospitalisations with vitamin C injections. Since old people generally don't respond well to vaccines, Vitamin C injections would have been far more effective without any side affects or need or clinical trials.
Excerpts from their other lab leak book: https://jimhaslam.substack.com/p/new-canadian-book
If most or all people had 50 ng/mL (125 nmol/L) or more circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D (made in the liver over several days from ingested of UV-B -> skin produced vitamin D3) the lab-escaped SARS-CoV-2 virus would never have spread in pandemic fashion. Even with today's more infectious strains, in a naive population, this would probably suppress R0 well below the 1.0 required for pandemic transmission.
For instance, in the UK, in the summer of 2020, before there were any so-called vaccines, COVID-19 numbers were dwindling rapidly and the pandemic was thought to be over. See the second chart at: https:// vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#4.2 . The virus had infected the most vulnerable - I think mainly in London, among the elderly in care homes and especially among those with dark or black skin, whose 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels are perilously low without proper vitamin D3 supplementation.* With those most vulnerable (those with the lowest 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels) either dead or with strong natural immunity against this original strain, the number of hospitalised COVID-19 patients was halving every month or so. It got down to 795 patients in late August, from a peak of 19,617 in April. This was primarily due to the summer general rise in 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels, even though this takes the white population's mean levels only to about half of the 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L needed for full immune system function. There was little or no masking or social distancing in this time.
In September and later, as 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels dropped and as a new, more infectious strain of SARS-CoV-2 emerged, infections rose and so did the number of hospitalised patients. So I argue that in Wuhan, if everyone had had at least 50 ng/mL 25-hydroxyvitamin D, the lab-escaped virus would have infected few, if any, people, and those who were infected would have had such mild infections, in general, that they would have shed far too few viruses for the disease to spread in a pandemic fashion.
*See the graphs at: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#03-uk-low. The second is from Sutherland et al. 2020: https://sci-hub.se/10.1016/j.clnu.2020.11.019 and the first I made from data in that article's Table 2. The first shows that in both summer and winter, for the "Asian" people (of Indian, Pakistani and Bangladeshi descent) in the 40 to 68 year olds sampled in this BIOBANK 2006 to 2010 research period, 91% had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels of 20 ng/mL (50 nmol/L) or less. Over half of these people had 10 ng/mL (25 nmol/L) or less. (This is from Table 2, in which the four summer columns and the four winter columns depict proportions of the group with 25(OH)D levels below 25 nmol/L, between 25 and 50 nmol/L etc. The percentage signs at the top of the table should be "nmol/L".
There is little summer / winter difference in levels for those with dark or black skin, but the differences for people with white skin are much more pronounced. From Table 2, in winter and spring, among the White European people in the research study, 17.5% had 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels below 25 nmol/L (10 ng/mL) while in summer and autumn, this drops to 5.9%.
Since this significant summer / winter modulation of 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels for most of the population, most dramatically in those with the lowest levels, was apparently largely responsible for the pandemic of the original Wuhan strain of SARS-CoV-2 dying out rapidly in mid-2020, it is reasonable to extrapolate this to a situation where everyone had at least 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L all year round. In such a situation, where most people's immune system worked well, rather than not very well - and for some people very poorly - it is reasonable to think that no variant of SARS-CoV-2 would spread in pandemic fashion, even with the population with no immunity to these specific viruses, and with no social distancing, masking etc., or other interventions such as genuine vaccines or the gene-therapies falsely marketed as vaccines.
While large amounts of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) can be very effective in acute viral infections, I believe that by far the most important preventive technique is having as many people as possible attaining 50 ng/mL or more circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D all year round. The only practical, safe, way of doing this is proper vitamin D3 supplementation at levels, which while small, are 8 or more times what governments and many doctors recommend. New Jersey based Professor of Medicine Sunil Wimalawansa has recommended quantities, based on body weight and obesity status: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#00-how-much.
With today's typically very low 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels in patients hospitalised for viral infections and sepsis, the most important treatment is surely using a single oral dose of calcifediol (such as 1.0 milligram for 70 kg body weight) to boost circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D safely over 50 ng/mL in a few hours. https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/#4.7 Calcifediol is another name for 25-hydroxyvitamin D. It is easily absorbed and goes straight into circulation. A loading (bolus = large, single) dose of vitamin D3 is the next best approach, such as 10 mg (400,000 IU). However, this takes some days to raise circulating 25-hydroxyvitamin D due to the need for hydroxylation in the liver.
This calcifediol treatment alone would have saved the lives of most people who died from COVID-19, as well as most of the 11 million or so a year (2017 figures https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(19)32989-7/fulltext) who die from sepsis.
Dr Paul Marik https://covid19criticalcare.com/experts/paul-e-marik/ https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6206928/ is one of the pioneers of ascorbic acid (vitamin C) treatment for sepsis. There's a limit to what the stomach can absorb, so the grams per day are supplied intravenously.
This, combined with Prof. Wimalawansa's 0.014 mg / kg body weight calcifediol protocol would be even more effective than either treatment alone.
Intravenous ascorbic acid requires hospital facilities, medical staff and precisely measured, sterile, fluids. This limits its applicability in remote locations and developing countries.
I recall that Prof. Brighthope led research into a rectal route of supplying sodium ascorbate, which is as effective as IV ascorbic acid. This does not rely on sterile materials and hypodermic needles, so it is much more applicable in remote locations and developing countries. I can't find my links about this, but this form of treatment is mentioned at: https://orthomolecular.org/resources/omns/v10n13.shtml.
Thanks for the heads up re the book.
Here is a vitamin-c timeline which Dr Pierre Kory has said he'd reference in his book on vit c. So much suppress history.
https://totalityofevidence.com/vitamin-c
There are so many distractions keeping you all from seeing what is actually happening.
You all have to turn the BS filter to max and focus on the reality of the situation.
conventional wisdom?? would offer a word substitution
Nothing wise about it, how about rhetoric?