21 Comments
User's avatar
KoalaPower's avatar

All lies to keep the money machine going. Look at what the inventor of the PCR test said and what happened to him. Can we trust any diagnostic tests these days?

Expand full comment
Anna Harper's avatar

That is a very relevant question!

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

This is a gigantic ‘protection racket’!

Mass populations are being terrorised with a multitude of threats, eg manufactured crises such as ‘Covid’…the set of common respiratory symptoms which aren’t a serious threat to most people.

The medical industrial complex exploiting the people with this fraud.

Billions of people being roped into submit to bogus tests and medical interventions, apparently humans can’t exist without this constant interference…

And ‘our governments’ at the forefront of this exploitation of the people, eg constantly badgering us to submit to a torrent of vaccine products. They’re the frontline marketing machine, using our taxpayer dollars to feather the nests of pHarma.

How do we turn the tables on this shower?

Expand full comment
rrodynmac's avatar

We must all stick together, and NOT COMPLY to anything gov’t wants us to do, especially digital, rather BIOMETRIC ID.

We must make this fail, or they (gov’t) WILL take control of our money. They want this to be done by the end of the year.

Australia is the “test” nation for uptake of this evil ID.

Just tell everyone we can-DO NOT COMPLY with digital/BIOMETRIC ID, or basically we have no future-no future to do what we want to anyway.

This is one way to fight back, and fight back we must! Thank you for all you do Elizabeth!

Expand full comment
Tim Renouf's avatar

Thank you once again, Ian.

This is yet again another well articulated explanation of a complex component of the COVID era (five years and counting) of the 'Great Leap Forward' Plandemic.

It's difficult to know what more can be said to drive home the points so well made by Ian and countless others across the world.

One can only hope that Robert Kennedy's high profile leadership position in the US health adminstration continues the wind back of the power of the pharmaceutical industry, accumulated over decades.

Expand full comment
Ian Brighthope's avatar

I sincerely hope the largest of Class Actions around the world destroy this heinously dangerous industry. The injection of poisons into the blood stream will one day be looked upon as worse than anything ever done in the name of medicine.

Expand full comment
rrodynmac's avatar

RFKjr wants all Americans to have “wearables” for his “MAHA”. The wearables can be invasive, or watches, etc.

RFKjr is not what people want him to be. He is controlled, like Trump.

Expand full comment
Karyne's avatar

Like you, Reiner Fuellmich of investigative Corona Committee hit the nail on the head from the beginning. He could see The Covid Con was built upon the lie of the PCR test. It was the perpetrators guarantee that the con would be successful, as it was. Kary Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test said it should never be used as a diagnostic tool, but it was. He’s dead and Reiner is in jail. Funny that. I think the only way to stop the continuing fraud is to educate people. The politicians and bureaucrats are bought and paid for. We can only save those who are now willing to listen.

Expand full comment
rrodynmac's avatar

Very well said Karyne! We can’t save everyone!

Expand full comment
Rob's avatar

There may be some arse coverage going on here as well as profiteering. With only 6% of eligible aussies getting a booster this year, they may be worried that the sheep are getting ready to charge.

Expand full comment
rrodynmac's avatar

I think many are ready to charge Rob!

Expand full comment
Julie Pettiford's avatar

My concern with RFK is that he’s currently talking about every person wearing biometric appliances. He’s been captured by the Ai being integrated into medicine. To me that’s just as frightening.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth Hart's avatar

Julie, my comment on James Lyons-Weiler’s article on this subject:

QUOTE

Wow, thanks for this extensive information.

While one can appreciate the benign uses for this technology, we are living in a world where informed consent for medical interventions and privacy is being trashed.

As technocrats exert ever-increasing power over our lives, without our informed consent, the mind boggles at where this is all heading.

We already have the appalling situation where vaccination has been mandated for years, accepted as a given - what next, implants to control and monitor our every move, and people threatened with being locked out of society if they refuse to comply?

Before this goes any further, it’s time right now to address mandatory vaccination, a travesty that should never have been allowed to occur.

This precedent for mandatory interventions must be challenged now.

The vital principle of valid voluntary informed consent for ANY intervention must be paramount.

END OF QUOTE

See: Wearable Medical Devices: A Rational Guide for Activists and Regulators:

https://popularrationalism.substack.com/p/wearable-medical-devices-a-rational

Expand full comment
Roc Findlay's avatar

Biometric appliances, a means ( the brother & sister) to an end, Julie. They're ALL in on it, Larry Ellison is watching the clock.

Expand full comment
Mediocrates's avatar

Why won't pro-vaxxers accept the fact that unvaccinated (Covid-19) persons do not suffer from "long Covid"? Neither do the RT false positive asymptomatic persons. The risk vs benefit equation does not favour Covid-19 vaccinations for any age cohort.

Expand full comment
richard noakes's avatar

I don't think Big Pharma cares anymore - why kill their Golden Goose, no, they won't let you: Washington Post Reports on ‘Plan to Vaccinate All Americans, Despite RFK Jr.’

Vaccine makers, pharmacists, professional medical societies and others opposed to recent changes in vaccine policy are banding together to create their own system for recommending and purchasing vaccines in a move designed to bypass government health agencies’ recommendations, The Washington Post reported.

by Brenda Baletti, Ph.D.

June 24, 2025

Vaccine makers, pharmacists, professional medical societies and others opposed to recent changes in vaccine policy are banding together to create their own system for recommending and purchasing vaccines in a move designed to bypass government health agencies’ recommendations, The Washington Post reported.

Members of the new group, all of whom profit from the vaccine industry, along with some state health officials and a “new advocacy group,” are strategizing ways to preserve the vaccine status quo under U.S. Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

The anonymous group, which hopes to create “a nongovernmental vaccine system” for vaccine recommendations and purchasing, according to the Post, is engaged in a series of discussions.

Topics include ordering vaccines directly from manufacturers and prioritizing recommendations from medical associations rather than from the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), which makes vaccine recommendations to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The move comes as Kennedy dismissed all of ACIP’s sitting committee members earlier this month due to concerns over conflicts of interest in the committee. He filled eight of the 17 committee seats a few days later.

Commenting on industry insiders’ efforts to create a new commission, research scientist James Lyons-Weiler, Ph.D., told The Defender:

“They want to create and lend authority to a corporation-backed, corporation-friendly committee to replace the one that was just disbanded. These moves would represent replacing the facade of regulating vaccines by a government agency with overt industry self-governance and regulation.”

The Post called the move by the unspecified group of actors “extraordinary,” but conceded that it “faces major challenges.”

For example, insurance companies typically don’t cover shots that aren’t recommended by ACIP. An ACIP recommendation is also the basis on which the federal Vaccines for Children Program pays for vaccines for minors whose families can’t afford them. That program covers vaccine costs for about half of U.S. children.

Also, in many states, pharmacists’ ability to prescribe or administer vaccines is tied to the adult and child immunization schedules recommended by ACIP. And state laws for school vaccine requirements, as well as requirements for healthcare workers, are typically tied to ACIP recommendations.

Another problem, according to the Post, is that “potential competing recommendations could sow confusion among doctors as well as patients if it becomes unclear which recommendations to follow.”

Lyons-Weiler said physicians should be wary of any recommendations coming from the nongovernmental group, especially because participating in federal programs while failing to comply with ACIP regulations could violate statutes.

“The dismissed ACIP committee members can form whatever opinion group they want, but physicians follow their recommendations over the rules and regulations of the HHS at their own peril,” he said.

In a recent article, Lyons-Weiler said calls to ignore recommendations from the new ACIP committee are largely circulated by the former ACIP members who were dismissed because of their ties to Big Pharma.

Former Merck consultant and dismissed ACIP member Dr. Helen Chu was quoted in a recent op-ed in MedPage Today as calling on physicians to “turn away” from ACIP’s vaccine recommendations. She received thousands of dollars from Merck in the year before her ACIP appointment.

Merck is the manufacturer of multiple major childhood vaccines, including the Gardasil HPV vaccine; the MMRII for measles, mumps and rubella; a chicken pox vaccine and several others.

“Undermining ACIP in favor of non-statutory organizations may represent a breach of federal compliance by physicians and healthcare institutions receiving federal funds,” Lyons-Weiler wrote. Chu should be well aware of that fact, he added.

Initiative pushes Pharma-linked medical associations to make recommendations

According to the Post, the group’s discussions are being facilitated by the “Vaccine Integrity Project,” a new initiative at the University of Minnesota, which includes “vaccine manufacturers, health insurers and medical associations.” The group is funded by iAlumbra, a nonprofit founded by Walmart heiress and billionaire philanthropist Christy Walton, known for her anti-Trump advocacy.

Former U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Commissioner Margaret Hamburg and Dr. Harvey Fineberg, former president of the Institute of Medicine and current president of the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation, co-chair an eight-member steering committee leading the initiative.

In an op-ed published in STAT News, Hamburg and Fineberg said the project will use “the best available evidence” to “safeguard vaccine policy, information and utilization.”

When the group was launched, Michael Osterholm, Ph.D., a member of the COVID-19 Advisory Board under the Biden administration, said it was not intended to serve as a shadow or parallel version of the ACIP.

However, according to today’s report from the Post, that intention appears to have changed.

Dr. Anne Zink, member of the Vaccine Integrity Project, told the Post that having each state set its own recommendations is “not ideal” and that instead, the major medical associations should make recommendations.

Medical associations participating in the Vaccine Integrity Project talks include the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), the American Academy of Family Physicians, the American College of Physicians, the American Pharmacists Association, and the National Foundation for Infectious Diseases, the Post reported.

In her op-ed, Chu also named the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) as a key group advising alternative vaccination policy.

Lyons-Weiler noted that AAP has received millions of dollars in grants from Merck, Sanofi and Pfizer, and that ACOG has endorsed products from its sponsors without conducting any independent review.

ACOG also took $11 million from the CDC to push the COVID-19 vaccines on pregnant women.

HHS spokesperson Andrew Nixon said the agency and CDC “remain committed to ensuring that vaccine guidance is rigorous, independent, and truly in service to the health of the American people — not corporate interests.”

The Post reported that Nixon also called one of the new coalition’s leading organizations “a self-appointed echo chamber masquerading as oversight.”

Under Kennedy, the CDC has changed its guidance on COVID-19 vaccines for pregnant women from recommended to “no guidance.”

One member of the Vaccine Integrity Project, Asa Hutchinson, former Republican governor of Arkansas, noted that beyond changes to COVID-19 vaccine recommendations, no other changes have been made to vaccine policy since Kennedy took office.

In the upcoming meeting this week, ACIP is set to vote on RSV (respiratory syncytial virus) immunization recommendations for pregnant mothers, babies and young children.

The committee will also vote on the mercury-containing flu vaccine, and will discuss but not vote on other vaccines, including COVID-19, chikungunya, anthrax and MMRV (measles, mumps, rubella, varicella).

Brenda Baletti, Ph.D., is a senior reporter for The Defender

Expand full comment
dude 01's avatar

Remember when you got the COVID-19 jab, you sometimes got a FREE donut, or a FREE pre-roll, or some other FREE sh//:. ? Creeps like Gates are licking their chops. DON’T FALL FOR IT!

Expand full comment
dude 01's avatar

Where’s Fauci?

Expand full comment
Barbara Charis's avatar

The MODUS OPERANDI of unscrupulous people in the entire Medical Industry and the Media...is using FEAR to motivate people to act quickly without taking the time to think rationally...it will not be in your best interests Moving too quickly is going to hurt you...not save you. If you want to be healthy...it is a DIY (do it yourself) agenda. You are the one who will bring it about by your daily actions. NO medical doctor can do it for you. A strong immune system is produced by eating natural whole foods, getting sunshine, fresh air, exercise, good sleep and living a healthy lifestyle. Your own natural immune system will protect your health...not taking drugs and vaccines which will break it down. Med School does not teach prevention...it promotes treatments using invasive methods, such as, drugs and vaccines.

Expand full comment
Kristina Morros's avatar

Love this!

Expand full comment