Albanese, Labor, Liberal, Greens and Teals are infiltrated with Marxist ideologies. We are very close to becoming a communist-style State. WOKE and Anti-WOKE: compare Australia and the 'new' USA.
Freedom of the Press in the US and massive censorship in Austrralia.
The Return of the Golden Age: Karoline Leavitt on the Trump Administration’s First Press Briefing
In a symbolic and historic moment, the newly inaugurated Trump administration held its first White House press briefing today, marking a renewed commitment to transparency, communication, and a clear vision for the future. Karoline Leavitt, the dynamic new White House Press Secretary, took the podium with poise and determination, embodying the administration’s promise to usher in what they call "The Golden Age of America." We had one in Australia about the time I was born.
Leavitt’s presence at the podium, in itself, was a statement. At 26, she is not only one of the youngest, brightest and attractive press secretaries in history but also a clear sign of the administration’s embrace of fresh energy, new perspectives, and a renewed focus on the voices of young Americans. Her debut performance was met with anticipation from the press and the public alike, as the administration sought to set the tone for its approach to governance, communication, and media relations.
Leavitt began by addressing the importance of the press briefing as a cornerstone of American democracy. "The American people deserve to know the truth, unfiltered and direct," she said. "This administration is committed to restoring trust in the media, ensuring transparency, and giving the public the information they need to make informed decisions."
The Trump administration's decision to reintroduce daily press briefings was framed as a direct response to concerns about the erosion of trust between the public and the media. Leavitt emphasised that future briefings would prioritise accessibility, openness, and a genuine effort to engage with tough questions rather than sidestep them.
"We understand that the press plays a critical role in our democracy," Leavitt remarked. "We may not always agree, but we respect your duty to hold us accountable. In turn, we ask that you approach your work with fairness and a willingness to engage in meaningful dialogue."
The press briefing covered several key points of the administration’s vision and early policy priorities.
1. Economic Revival: Leavitt highlighted the administration's plans to rejuvenate the American economy, focusing on job creation, reducing inflation, and supporting small businesses. She underscored the importance of empowering American workers and reigniting the country’s industrial base.
2. National Unity: A recurring theme in the briefing was the administration’s commitment to healing political divides and fostering a sense of national unity. Leavitt noted that President Trump views this term as an opportunity to bring Americans together, regardless of their political affiliations.
3. Foreign Policy: Leavitt touched on the administration’s plans to strengthen America’s global standing through “peace through strength,” maintaining strategic alliances, and advancing American interests abroad.
4. Energy Independence: A cornerstone of the administration's vision, Leavitt spoke passionately about the push for energy independence, emphasising the need to capitalise on America’s natural resources (dig baby dig, drill baby drill) while balancing environmental concerns with pragmatic solutions.
5. Infrastructure Investment: The administration plans to prioritise massive infrastructure upgrades, including modernising roads, bridges, and broadband networks, aimed at creating jobs and enhancing the quality of life for all Americans.
Leavitt fielded a variety of questions from reporters, addressing everything from healthcare reform to immigration policy. While her responses were measured and professional, she did not shy away from controversial topics, setting a precedent for future engagements with the press.
One of the most striking moments of the briefing was Leavitt’s assertion that "The Golden Age of America has returned." This phrase encapsulates the administration’s belief that the nation is poised to reclaim its former glory through strategic policymaking, bold leadership, and a renewed sense of purpose. Love it!!!
Leavitt elaborated on this vision, describing it as a time when American values, innovation, and strength would shine on the world stage. "The Golden Age is not just a phrase," she said. "It’s a call to action—a reminder that we, as Americans, have the power to shape our destiny and build a future that reflects our highest ideals."
The administration’s emphasis on this theme suggests a focus on optimism and forward-thinking policies designed to inspire confidence and pride in the nation’s future. I just hope that this administration can achieve peace in the world because here in Australia it doesn’t seem to be an issue high on the agenda.
Leavitt concluded the briefing by outlining plans for future engagements with the press. She announced that briefings would be held daily and would feature key members of the administration, including Cabinet officials, to provide updates on specific policy areas. Wouldn’t that be great in Australia.
Additionally, the administration plans to leverage technology to make briefings more accessible to the public. This includes live-streaming events, providing real-time translations for non-English speakers, and encouraging questions from citizens through social media platforms. "We want every American to feel connected to the work we are doing," Leavitt explained. "This administration belongs to the people, and we are here to serve you."
As expected, reactions to the first press briefing were mixed. Supporters of the administration praised Leavitt’s professionalism, clarity, and composure, hailing her as a refreshing change and a promising voice for the future. Critics, however, raised concerns about potential spin and the administration’s ability to follow through on its promises. Some media outlets questioned the use of the term "Golden Age," arguing that it risked setting unrealistic expectations or glossing over challenges the country continues to face, challenges that will always be there. Nonetheless, there was a general consensus that Leavitt’s debut set a constructive tone and laid the groundwork for more substantive discussions in the weeks and months ahead.
The first press briefing of the Trump administration was not just an event; it was a statement of intent. It underscored the administration’s commitment to engaging with the media, addressing the concerns of the American people, and charting a bold course for the future. For Karoline Leavitt, the journey is just beginning. Her performance today suggested that she is more than ready for the challenges ahead, combining youthful enthusiasm with a deep sense of responsibility. As the face of the administration’s communication efforts, she will play a critical role in shaping public perception and building trust. As the administration moves forward, all eyes will be on the White House press room. Will the commitment to transparency and dialogue hold firm? Can the administration deliver on its promises and truly usher in a new era of prosperity and unity? One thing is clear: The American people, and others, are watching closely, and the press briefings to come will serve as both a platform for the administration’s agenda and a barometer of its success. For now, the phrase "The Golden Age of America" serves as both a rallying cry and a challenge—a vision of what the country could become and a reminder of the work yet to be done.
Caroline Kennedy's Critique of RFK Jr.: A Response to Misdirected Attacks
In her letter to ‘World News’, Caroline Kennedy criticised Robert F. Kennedy Jr., questioning his credibility and motives. She accused him of spreading misinformation and claimed that his views on public health, vaccines, and government transparency contradict the values their family has long stood for.
Caroline Kennedy formerly served as the United States Ambassador to Australia. Appointed by President Joe Biden, she officially assumed the role in July 2022. As ambassador, she represented U.S. interests in Australia, fostering diplomatic relations, strengthening alliances, and addressing shared challenges such as regional security, trade, and climate change. Her tenure was built on a longstanding connection between the Kennedy family and public service, emphasising collaboration and mutual respect in U.S.-Australia relations.
Caroline Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) are first cousins. Caroline is the daughter of President John F. Kennedy (JFK), while RFK Jr. is the son of JFK's younger brother, Robert F. Kennedy (RFK). Both families are part of the renowned Kennedy political dynasty, deeply rooted in American politics and public service.
Despite their familial bond, the two have diverged sharply on public issues, particularly given RFK Jr.’s controversial stances on vaccines and public health policies. Caroline’s criticisms of RFK Jr., such as in her letter to *World News*, highlight these differences, reflecting a broader ideological divide within the Kennedy family. This dynamic illustrates how political and personal values can vary, even within one of America’s most iconic families. She painted RFK Jr. as a divisive figure whose advocacy undermines trust in institutions and jeopardises the well-being of Americans. Her remarks were pointed, implying that RFK Jr.'s actions tarnish the legacy of their father and uncle, President John F. Kennedy.
Caroline’s critique leans heavily on broad accusations without addressing the substance of RFK Jr.’s positions. For instance, while she labels his advocacy as dangerous, she does not engage with the evidence or reasoning he presents on issues like vaccine safety or governmental overreach. Sweeping dismissals do little to advance constructive dialogue or address legitimate public concerns. RFK Jr.’s activism stems from a well-documented commitment to public health and environmental safety. Labelling him as divisive ignores his consistent calls for accountability and transparency principles that align closely with the Kennedy family legacy of championing truth and justice.
By focusing on family values and legacy rather than engaging with RFK Jr.'s arguments, Caroline inadvertently weakens her case. Her reliance on the Kennedy name as a moral high ground comes across as an attempt to discredit RFK Jr. based on association rather than merit. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has consistently shown himself to be a principled advocate for health, environmental justice, and government transparency. While his positions, particularly on vaccines, have sparked controversy, they are rooted in a desire to question unchecked authority and ensure that public policies are backed by rigorous science. His work with organizations like Children’s Health Defense exemplifies his commitment to safeguarding the health of future generations.
Moreover, RFK Jr. represents a necessary voice in an era when trust in institutions has eroded. His willingness to challenge narratives even at personal and professional cost embodies the courage and independence that the Kennedy family has historically championed. Open debate and scrutiny of policies are hallmarks of democracy, and silencing dissent does more harm than good. Caroline Kennedy’s critique, while passionate, overlooks the nuance of RFK Jr.’s advocacy. Instead of dismissing him outright, a fairer approach would be to engage in meaningful discussions about the issues he raises. Defending RFK Jr. is not about agreeing with every stance he takes but about upholding the values of free speech, inquiry, and accountability that define a robust democratic society.
Comparing Australia’s Woke Environment to America’s Renaissance
As I reflect on the resurgence of optimism and purpose evident in the Trump administration’s first press briefing, I cannot help but draw comparisons to the current cultural and political landscape here in Australia. Both nations share democratic traditions and values, yet their trajectories at this moment feel profoundly different. Australia finds itself deeply entrenched in a "woke" ideology that stifles free expression, prioritises virtue signalling over pragmatic governance, and marginalises dissenting voices. Meanwhile, the United States appears to be experiencing a cultural and political renaissance, led by an administration committed to reasserting foundational principles such as free speech, economic opportunity, and individual accountability.
Australia’s political and cultural environment has increasingly been dominated by ‘progressive movements’ that, while aiming to address historical injustices, have overreached. Policies and social norms have evolved to emphasise inclusivity, but this has also resulted in an atmosphere where alternative viewpoints are often suppressed.
Public figures, academics, and even everyday Australians face significant backlash for expressing opinions that deviate from the mainstream narrative. The introduction of legislation, like the proposed Albanese Government’s ‘Misinformation Disinformation Bill’, exacerbates these issues, threatening free speech in the name of combating misinformation.
Australia's media landscape is heavily centralised, with major outlets often promoting a single narrative. Alternative media struggles to gain a foothold, leaving many Australians without access to diverse perspectives. Policies aimed at addressing climate change, indigenous issues, or gender equity, while well-intentioned, are often implemented without sufficient consideration of economic or social impacts. This can lead to division rather than the unity such policies seek to achieve. During the COVID-19 plandemic, Australia implemented some of the strictest lockdown measures in the world. While these were framed as ‘necessary for public health’, they highlighted an alarming willingness to curtail individual freedoms in the name of collective safety.
In contrast, the United States under the Trump administration is embracing a renewed sense of purpose. The focus is on economic growth, energy independence, and revitalising national pride while fostering open discourse. Key aspects include media pluralism, the reclamation of national identity, the empowerment of the individual and resilience against ‘woke’ ideology.
The inclusion of alternative and private media in White House press briefings marks a significant shift toward embracing diverse viewpoints. This policy underscores the importance of dismantling media gatekeeping and ensuring all voices are heard. The rhetoric of a “Golden Age of America” seeks to inspire unity and pride by emphasizing shared values and achievements. This contrasts with Australia’s struggle to reconcile its colonial past with its multicultural present. Economic policies focusing on deregulation, tax cuts, and job creation prioritise the individual over the collective, fostering a sense of empowerment that resonates with the American ethos. While America is not immune to the influences of woke culture, the Trump administration’s commitment to free speech and opposition to cancel culture offers a stark counterpoint to Australia’s approach.
The core difference between these trajectories lies in the approach to governance and cultural identity. Australia’s progressive policies often prioritise collective (Marxist) ideals at the expense of individual freedoms, whereas America’s current renaissance seeks to strike a balance between collective prosperity and individual empowerment.
The United States is reasserting the importance of free speech as a cornerstone of democracy. By inviting alternative media into the press room, the Trump administration demonstrates a commitment to transparency and the free exchange of ideas. Australia, on the other hand, risks further alienating its citizens through policies that restrict speech and suppress dissenting opinions. America’s embrace of diverse media voices highlights a growing recognition of the biases inherent in legacy outlets. This stands in contrast to Australia’s concentrated media environment, which often discourages independent journalism and better alternative perspectives.
While America focuses on rebuilding its economy and securing energy independence, Australia prioritises symbolic policies that lack the pragmatism needed for sustainable progress. The Trump administration’s rhetoric of a Golden Age fosters a sense of unity and purpose, emphasising shared goals and achievements. In Australia, the focus on identity politics has, pathetically at times, deepened societal divisions rather than bridging them.
Australia can draw valuable lessons from the United States’ current approach. The reaffirmation to a commitment of Free Speech is a no brainer. A democracy only thrives on open dialogue. Policymakers should prioritise protecting freedom of expression, even when opinions are uncomfortable or controversial.
We need to diversify media representation. Encouraging alternative and independent media voices that will be heard will create a more balanced and informed public discourse. We need to develop pragmatic policies. Policymakers must balance ideals with practical solutions that benefit all Australians. And, there is a dire need to promote unity through shared values. By emphasising common goals and national achievements, Australia can build a stronger and more cohesive, inclusive society.
As the United States embraces a renaissance of purpose and principle, Australia faces a crossroads. Will it continue down a path of woke overreach (Albaneseism), or will it rise to the challenge of fostering a society that values free speech, media diversity, and pragmatic governance? The lessons are clear, and the choice is ours to make. Wokism must go. We deserve politicians with the courage of Trump. We dont deserve plotiticans like Albanese who has presided over our deteriorating living standards.
In the spirit of both nations' democratic ideals, we must strive to ensure that liberty, equality, and opportunity are not just aspirations but lived realities for all. The stakes are high, but the potential for renewal is boundless—if only we have the courage to seize it.
Ian Brighthope
It’s not just Caroline Kennedy’s $7 million in Bigly Pharma stocks that wants to Make America Sick Again, MASA. the MASA being Big Pharma, slaves are the sick and addicted.
Nope. Also at stake is Tax Payers footing the bill for biosynthetic Gila Monster Venom weight loss at $1,500/month for Medicare/Medicaid. ChaChing $$$ for Insider traitors in Congress and the Pharma paid lobbyists MASAs like Mike Pence.
How much wood could a wood Snake like Pence wood, could a wood snake in the woulds of Congress during the year of the Would Snakes? If Congress stoped using tax dollars to pay for Bernie Sander’s Viagra?
The light and truth you brought forth during the scamdemic was epic. This article/writing may surpass it. People of the world need to unite in their efforts to bring forth a new renaissance of hope. peace, and prosperity. Only with God's Help, Word, and Spirit can this be accomplished. The task is great, the rewards even better. Thank you.