Trump to dismantle the Deep State. At long last we may have a thousand years of civilisation.

Australia must do the same, other the current authoritarians will become full-blown dictators given time.

I will Clean Out the Corrupt Actors Everywhere.

Click the video below:

The Deep State

The concept of a "deep state" refers to a network of powerful, often unelected officials within the government, military, intelligence agencies, or connected industries who exert influence beyond or in opposition to elected authorities. This notion isn’t unique to any single country and has been used to describe alleged shadow influences in many governments, particularly the U.S. and Turkey.

The origin of the term "deep state" is typically traced back to Turkey, where it emerged in the 20th century as "derin devlet," describing a covert alliance of the military, intelligence agencies, and organised crime with the aim of controlling the state outside democratic processes. In the U.S., the "deep state" concept became more prominent in the 1960s, especially during and after the Vietnam War and Watergate scandal, when public trust in government declined due to revelations of covert intelligence operations, surveillance, and political manipulation. Figures like former CIA official Ray McGovern have pointed to the CIA’s influence on politics as a historical example of a kind of “deep state.”

The concept evolved further after the Cold War, with increased public awareness of intelligence agencies' clandestine activities. More recently, in the 21st century, discussions of a U.S. "deep state" were popularised in reaction to perceived bureaucratic resistance to presidential administrations, particularly during the first Trump administration. However, while certain powerful networks and individuals do shape policy and outcomes, the term is controversial. It oversimplifies complex institutional dynamics and lacks solid evidence in the way it's often depicted.

The statement that it oversimplifies complex institutional dynamics and lacks solid evidence in the way it's often depicted speaks to a common issue with broad narratives about influence networks, like the concept of the “deep state” or global elite organizations like the World Economic Forum. These narratives can risk painting intricate power structures with a broad brush, which many claim may overlook the nuanced and multi-layered processes involved in policymaking, international relations, and economic decision-making. Transparency is their enemy.

In complex institutions, decisions and policies are rarely driven by a single, unified agenda. Instead, they typically result from a mix of competing interests, bureaucratic inertia, individual personalities, and sometimes contradictory pressures from multiple stakeholders. While some individuals or groups may wield disproportionate influence, depicting these organizations as homogenous entities with single-minded objectives ignores the internal checks, balances, and even conflicts that characterise most large institutions.

Claims about global agendas or shadow governance may lack concrete evidence as they are often inferred from circumstantial factors or isolated events rather than documented actions or clear directives. That should never detract from the probabilities of corruption. The lack of transparency within some organizations, like intelligence agencies or multinational forums, can understandably fuel speculation, but credible scrutiny relies on documented facts rather than speculation or generalised accusations.

That said, healthy skepticism and vigilance regarding power structures are important in democratic societies. Examining the actions and policies of powerful entities, rather than presuming hidden motives, allows for a grounded critique based on observable evidence and encourages accountability without oversimplifying the realities of institutional behaviour.

It’s difficult for an ordinary citizen like me to determine the full truth behind the idea of a “deep state” because these operations, if they exist, are designed to be opaque. However, there are some practical approaches to gathering insights and staying informed without falling into unsupported or exaggerated claims whilst remaining always sceptical.

While “deep state” theories can oversimplify real, nuanced institutional dynamics, it’s true that government transparency is often limited. Practicing careful, critical analysis, and seeking out fact-based information helps ordinary citizens engage meaningfully with questions of power and influence in government.

The Australian Deep State

The intricate interplay between money, power, and secrecy within the hierarchy of the Cabals, Dark State, and Deep State underscores the complex nature of modern geopolitics and governance.

The deep state in Australia operates in a similar vein, weaving a intricate web of influence and control that's often shrouded in secrecy. At the heart of this network lies a complex interplay between powerful individuals, influential corporations, and clandestine government agencies, all striving to shape national policies and agendas to their advantage.

One prominent example of this can be seen in the mining industry. Australia is rich in natural resources, making it a prime target for exploitation by multinational corporations. These companies often wield immense power and influence, using their financial might to lobby for policies that benefit their bottom line, often at the expense of the environment and the Australian public.

Another instance of the deep state at work can be found in the realm of national security and intelligence. The Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the Australian Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS) are two agencies that operate with a high degree of autonomy and discretion, working behind the scenes to protect national interests. While their work is crucial in maintaining security and counteracting potential threats, the veil of secrecy surrounding their operations raises questions about how much power they hold and how accountable they are to the public.

Furthermore, the deep state extends its reach into the political landscape of Australia. Political parties often find themselves entangled in a web of financial contributions and favours from powerful interest groups. These groups, fuelled by their own agendas, work to manipulate policies and elections to further their own interests, making it difficult for true democratic representation to flourish.

In essence, the deep state in Australia operates as a hidden force, manipulating policies, influencing industries, and exerting control over the political landscape. It thrives on secrecy and unchecked power, often at the expense of the public’s health, education, environment, public interest, and true democratic representation.

Ian Brighthope