COVID under trial
Thank you very much Senator Malcolm Roberts and Senator Pauline Hanson for exposing the truth and bringing these truth tellers together.
Click the picture below for the full 7 hour Inquiry
Questions put to Ian Brighthope by Senator Malcolm Roberts
A very brief summary of the Trial of Covid initiated by Senator Malcolm Roberts and assisted by the leader of One Nation, Senator Pauline Hanson.
The COVID-19 pandemic has been one of the most significant and deadly global crises in modern history, not only because of its health implications but also due to the political, social, and scientific controversies it has engendered. This document explores the key themes, arguments, and evidence presented during a discourse examining the response to COVID-19 and its broader implications.
1. The Power Dynamics and Response to the Pandemic
Several individuals and institutions seized the opportunity presented by the pandemic to exert control and gain wealth, implementing societal lockdowns, school closures, mask mandates, emergency use authorisations, and vaccine mandates. These actions were justified under the banner of public health but have faced serious criticism for their unintended consequences and the undermining of personal freedoms. Early preventative and treatment protocols were sidelined, dissenting voices were censored, and careers were destroyed for challenging the prevailing narrative.
Key individuals such as Anthony Fauci, Rochelle Walensky, and political leaders like President Joe Biden played significant roles in shaping the pandemic response in the United States. Institutions like the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the World Health Organization (WHO), and pharmaceutical giants like Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson were central to these efforts. This evil spread to the rest of the western world and beyond.
The proponents of these measures promoted slogans like "safe and effective" and "follow the science," which, in hindsight, have been critiqued as misleading and malinformation. Claims such as "vaccinated individuals do not carry the virus" or "natural immunity is ineffective" were propagated despite historical evidence to the contrary. This has led to widespread mistrust in and hatred of health authorities and media outlets.
2. The Role of the "COVID Cartel"
The so-called "COVID cartel," including federal health agencies, big pharmaceutical companies, legacy media, the BBC and ABCs and social media platforms, has been accused of collusion and widespread corruption. This group allegedly suppressed dissenting opinions, manipulated data, and prioritised massive profits over public health. The influence of this cartel extended globally, shaping policies and responses in many countries with disastrous consequences.
Entities such as the Biden administration, the CDC, the FDA, Big Tech platforms like Facebook and Twitter (now X), and media outlets like CNN and The New York Times were participating in this cartel. Key individuals like Bill Gates, through the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus of the WHO, also played pivotal roles in shaping the disastrous global health policy during the pandemic.
3. Political Awakening and Diversity of Opposition
An interesting aspect of the opposition to the mainstream COVID-19 response has been its political diversity. Individuals from across the political spectrum have united to challenge the prevailing narratives, driven by a shared recognition of the harms caused by these policies. This unity underscores the widespread nature of dissatisfaction and the urgency of addressing these issues.
Prominent figures like Senator Ron Johnson, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and whistleblowers such as Dr. Robert Malone and Dr. Peter McCullough have emerged as vocal critics, advocating for transparency and accountability.
4. Censorship and Suppression of Truth
The censorship of information has been a recurring theme. Social media platforms labelled truthful statements as "misinformation," de-platformed dissenters, and even removed support networks for vaccine-injured individuals. This suppression has led to widespread psychological distress among those millions affected and a growing sense of betrayal among the public. Organizations such as Facebook, Twitter (now X), and YouTube played pivotal roles in suppressing dissenting voices. This was often done in collaboration with governmental bodies like the CDC and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
5. The Consequences of Vaccine Mandates and Injuries
The mandates for COVID-19 vaccines, including their enforcement in military and civilian contexts, have been linked to an increase in adverse health outcomes. Reports of myocarditis, turbo-cancers, and other vaccine-related injuries have emerged, raising questions about the safety and efficacy of these interventions. Whistleblowers and independent researchers have highlighted the major discrepancies in official data and the dismissal of legitimate concerns by authorities.
The plight of the vaccine-injured has been particularly harrowing, with many experiencing severe health issues, loss of livelihood, societal neglect and torture . Organizations like the Department of Defense (DoD) and companies like Pfizer and Moderna have faced scrutiny for their roles in these outcomes.
6. Restoring Integrity in Science and Public Health
The loss of public trust in scientific research and health agencies has been profound. Allegations of data manipulation, conflicts of interest, and the prioritisation of corporate interests over public welfare have underscored the need for reform. Key proposals include:
- Bringing integrity back to scientific research by eliminating conflicts of interest and ensuring transparency.
- Banning pharmaceutical advertising to reduce undue influence.
- Reinstating liability for vaccine manufacturers to ensure accountability.
Furthermore, accountability must be a cornerstone of reform. This includes:
- Prosecuting individuals and organizations found guilty of fraudulent or unethical practices.
- Implementing stricter oversight of health agencies to prevent future abuses of power.
- Enacting laws that ensure transparency in public health decision-making and protect whistleblowers who expose corruption.
- Establishing independent review boards to evaluate emergency health measures and their long-term implications.
7. The Broader Impact on Society and Families
The societal impact of the pandemic and its response has been far-reaching, in fact global. Families have been torn apart by mandates, with individuals unable to bid farewell to dying loved ones due to lockdowns and restrictions. The psychological toll of these measures, coupled with the erosion of trust in institutions, has left a lasting scar on communities.
8. The Need for Comprehensive Inquiries
In countries like New Zealand, efforts are underway to conduct independent inquiries into the COVID-19 response. These inquiries aim to address vaccine efficacy, adverse reactions, reporting mechanisms, and the broader social impact of pandemic policies. The inclusion of personal testimonies and independent commissioners is seen as vital to ensuring transparency and accountability.
Notable political leaders like Winston Peters and parties such as New Zealand First have championed these efforts, emphasizing the importance of truth and justice.
9. Hope for Change and Future Directions
Despite the challenges, there is hope for reform and accountability. The emergence of alternative media platforms, the exposure of systemic flaws, and the resilience of truth-tellers have provided a foundation for change. Efforts to restore integrity in public health, ensure justice for those harmed, and rebuild trust in institutions are seen as essential steps forward.
Figures such as Elon Musk, who transformed Twitter (now X) into a platform for free speech, and investigative researchers like Ed Dowd have been instrumental in exposing truths and advocating for change.
Future laws must focus on:
- Establishing clear penalties for the suppression of scientific data and fraudulent practices in health crises.
- Creating mechanisms for rapid and fair compensation for individuals harmed by public health measures.
- Enforcing transparency requirements for partnerships between governments and private entities in health emergencies.
- Mandating periodic reviews of public health policies by independent panels to ensure ongoing accountability.
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the vulnerabilities and strengths of modern societies. While it exposed systemic corruption and the perils of centralised power, it also underscored the resilience of individuals committed to truth and justice. Moving forward, the lessons learned must guide efforts to build a more transparent, accountable, and equitable health system that prioritises the well-being of all. I will return with more about the Australian system and the treacherous Victorian government later today.
Ian Brighthope
While it was terribly sad that people could not say goodbye to their loved ones on their deathbed, it is just as awful that existing families can’t have a proper interactions with members of their families even now ! That awful seed planted by the “ powers that be” has forever replaced acceptance of diverse thought in families. Where once you’d hear for example “ Uncle Jim’s a bit weird about fishing licences ” e.g. families would accept his ideas, and invite him to family functions even if he “carried” on a bit. Now, if you disagree with the COVID mandates, you’re an outcast and a maniac and not invited unless you recant !
I find it very disturbing.
Well written Ian.